Skip to main content
Silver DH monogram logo

Portfolio

Case studies in learning design, accessibility, and faculty development

Selected projects show how I identify learning challenges, work within institutional constraints, and design practical systems for course quality, faculty development, and accessibility.

Selected work

Case Study

Accessible Course Review Framework

This project represents my work creating a repeatable process for identifying, documenting, and communicating online-course accessibility and quality concerns.

  • Accessibility Review
  • ADA Title II
  • WCAG
  • Course Quality
  • Quality Matters
  • Faculty Guidance
View case study
Challenge
Course reviews needed a more consistent way to identify accessibility barriers, document findings, communicate responsibilities, and guide faculty toward practical next steps.
Constraints
  • Limited instructional design staffing
  • Faculty ownership of academic content
  • Inherited and publisher-provided materials
  • Fixed academic timelines
  • Varying levels of faculty accessibility knowledge
  • Need to distinguish instructional design support from content ownership
Approach
Developed a structured review process using documented criteria, clear issue classifications, faculty-facing guidance, and defined pathways for remediation, escalation, and follow-up.
Deliverables
  • Course-review framework
  • Review report template
  • Accessibility criteria
  • Faculty communication language
  • Remediation guidance
  • Documentation and tracking process
Outcome or Status
Created a more consistent and documented review process that can be reused across courses while clarifying findings, responsibilities, and next steps.

Case Study

Faculty Accessibility Development Pathway

This project represents a multi-session faculty training program developed in response to ADA Title II accessibility requirements.

  • Faculty Development
  • ADA Title II
  • WCAG 2.1 AA
  • Accessibility Training
  • Professional Learning
  • Faculty Coaching
View case study
Challenge
Faculty needed practical, manageable preparation for creating and reviewing accessible course materials without being overwhelmed by legal, technical, or remediation requirements.
Constraints
  • Broad variation in faculty technical skills
  • Limited instructional design staffing
  • Need for scalable self-paced training
  • Applied activities and assessment requirements
  • Publisher-created materials faculty may not be authorized to edit
  • Institutional timelines connected to ADA Title II compliance
Approach
Designed a staged faculty-development pathway combining self-paced instruction, quizzes, applied accessibility activities, coaching opportunities, follow-up communication, and guidance for handling publisher-provided content.
Deliverables
  • Multi-session training sequence
  • Instructional videos
  • Quizzes
  • Applied Word and PowerPoint activities
  • Faculty guidance
  • Consultation pathway
  • Follow-up and completion workflows
Outcome or Status
Established a repeatable professional-development pathway designed to build faculty knowledge, provide practice, and connect training with ongoing support.

Case Study

Course Governance and Quality System

This project represents my work developing institutional systems for source courses, course lifecycle management, review, approval, production, maintenance, and archival practices.

  • Course Governance
  • Learning Systems
  • Quality Management
  • Workflow Design
  • Higher Education
  • Course Stewardship
View case study
Challenge
Course development and maintenance required clearer governance, ownership, naming conventions, review expectations, approval roles, and lifecycle documentation.
Constraints
  • Multiple course modalities
  • Multiple academic approval roles
  • Long-term maintenance requirements
  • Limited staffing
  • Need to preserve institutional memory
  • Recurring course resets and updates
  • Quality, accessibility, and production requirements
Approach
Designed a governance model that defines course types, identifiers, ownership, approval roles, lifecycle stages, review expectations, production pathways, maintenance rules, and archival practices.
Deliverables
  • Governance framework
  • Course lifecycle model
  • Naming and identification conventions
  • Approval structure
  • Review and production workflow
  • Maintenance and archival rules
  • Supporting documentation
Outcome or Status
Created a documented system intended to support consistency, accountability, scalability, and long-term course stewardship.

Teaching Resource Series

Comparative Politics Teaching Resource Series

This series reframes graduate comparative politics coursework as OER-informed teaching resources, including explainer articles, multimedia learning objects, data-informed infographics, comparative case studies, policy briefs, presentation decks, and comparative timelines designed for learner comprehension, reuse, visual learning, and accessible academic engagement.

  • OER-Informed Design
  • Comparative Politics
  • Multimedia Learning
  • Visual Learning Design
  • Teaching Resource
  • Graduate Work
View case study
Challenge
An eight-week comparative politics course included a sequence of assignments that could be designed as learner-facing teaching artifacts rather than isolated academic submissions.
Constraints
  • Graduate-level comparative politics content
  • Seven assignment products across an accelerated course
  • Open educational resource and Creative Commons considerations
  • Accessibility-conscious structure and visual support
  • Reader-facing explanation rather than standard coursework format
  • Careful source attribution, licensing, and discussion framing
Approach
Used the course as a design lab for reusable educational resources, applying learning objectives, key terms, structured sections, visual supports, captions, alt text, image credits, references, and discussion prompts.
Deliverables
  • Teaching-resource series framework
  • Downloadable comparative explainer article
  • Embedded comparative podcast
  • Reviewed transcript support
  • Data-informed comparative infographic
  • Written explanation support
  • Comparative institutional case study
  • Professional comparative policy brief
  • Comparative presentation deck
  • Speaker-note supported research
  • Comparative analytical timeline
  • Cognitive load-conscious visual design
  • Learning objectives and key terms
  • Theory-to-practice framing
  • Visual learning supports
Outcome or Status
The completed series includes the Week 2 teaching article, Week 3 comparative podcast, Week 4 comparative infographic, Week 5 case study, Week 6 policy brief, Week 7 presentation, and Week 8 comparative timeline and analysis.

Connect

Interested in learning design that lasts?

Connect about conference presentations, professional collaboration, faculty development, accessibility, or instructional design leadership.

Start a conversation